Free Engineering Tool · NFPA 555

Flashover Calculator

Find the fire size that would bring a room to flashover. Enter the room, its door or window and its linings, and the calculator compares the MQH, Babrauskas and Thomas correlations described in NFPA 555 against your design fire.

  • Based on NFPA 555
  • Free, runs in your browser; your inputs stay on your device
  • Screening tool, not reviewed or sealed by a licensed engineer
  • Last updated October 2026

Screening tool, not engineering advice. This calculator estimates results with simplified published methods. It has not been reviewed or sealed by a licensed engineer for your project, and DGA does not warrant that its results are accurate, complete or suitable for any use. Check every result independently and have the licensed professional responsible for your project review it before you rely on it. Use is subject to the Terms of Use.

Advanced method. The correlations behind this tool come from research and test data with narrow ranges of validity. Outside those ranges results can be wrong by a wide margin, and they are no substitute for a fire model or an analysis by a qualified fire protection engineer.

Fire, Room and Opening

For several openings, enter one opening with the same total area and an area-weighted height.

Walls and Ceiling

Result

Lowest flashover heat release rate
0
Design fire
0
MQH
0
Babrauskas
0
Thomas
0
Ventilation factor
0

Flashover Heat Release Rate by Method

Keep these results

About This Tool

Flashover is the transition from a fire in one item to a room in which every exposed combustible surface is burning. A hot gas layer about 500 °C above ambient, or roughly 20 kW/m2 of radiation at the floor, is the usual sign. Three hand correlations estimate the heat release rate a room needs to get there. All of them depend on the ventilation factor Ao√Ho, the opening area times the square root of its height, because the air an opening admits sets how much fire the room can hold.

MQH. Solving the McCaffrey, Quintiere and Harkleroad temperature correlation for a 500 K rise gives Qfo = 610 (hk AT Ao√Ho)1/2 in kW, where AT is the area of walls, floor and ceiling less the opening and hk is the wall heat transfer coefficient: k/δ once the lining has heated through (after tp = (ρc/k)(δ/2)2) and √(kρc/t) before that. Babrauskas. An energy balance with radiation to the walls and test data put flashover at about half the stoichiometric burning rate: Qfo = 750 Ao√Ho. Thomas. An average of measured losses gives Qfo = 7.8 AT + 378 Ao√Ho. The opening itself can feed at most about 1,500 Ao√Ho kW of burning inside the room.

Worked example

A 14 by 12 ft room, 8 ft high, lined with 5/8 in. gypsum board, has one 3 by 7 ft door. The ventilation factor is 55.6 ft5/2 (2.85 m5/2) and AT is 731 ft2 (67.9 m2). The board heats through in about 6.5 minutes, so for a 30 minute exposure hk = k/δ = 10.7 W/m2·K. MQH gives 878 kW, Thomas 1,607 kW and Babrauskas 2,137 kW. A 500 kW design fire is 57 percent of the lowest value, so flashover is not expected, while a fire over about 900 kW would reach the MQH limit. Early in the fire, at 2 minutes, the lining is still cold and absorbs more heat, so MQH rises to 1,669 kW and Thomas becomes the lowest.

Assumptions and limits

The methods treat the room as one well-mixed upper layer with a single opening and a steady fire. They scatter by a factor of about two, so the lowest value is the prudent screening limit. The test data behind them cover AT/(Ao√Ho) of roughly 9 to 65 m−1/2 and ventilation factors of 0.03 to 7.5 m5/2, and the MQH data came from rooms no more than 2.7 m high. Very large or tall rooms, rooms with combustible linings, several openings at different heights and mechanical ventilation are outside these methods. For several openings, one opening with the total area and an area-weighted height is a common approximation.

When to bring in an engineer

Flashover potential drives decisions on sprinkler omissions, interior finish, fire-rated separations and tenability in performance-based designs. DGA provides fire and smoke modeling and code consulting when the hand estimate is close to the design fire or the room is outside the methods.

References

  1. NFPA 555, Guide on Methods for Evaluating Potential for Room Flashover, National Fire Protection Association, 2021 edition.
  2. McCaffrey, B.J., Quintiere, J.G., and Harkleroad, M.F., “Estimating Room Temperatures and the Likelihood of Flashover Using Fire Test Data Correlations,” Fire Technology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1981, pp. 98 to 119.
  3. Babrauskas, V., “Estimating Room Flashover Potential,” Fire Technology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1980, pp. 94 to 103.
  4. Thomas, P.H., “Testing Products and Materials for Their Contribution to Flashover in Rooms,” Fire and Materials, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1981, pp. 103 to 111.
  5. Iqbal, N., and Salley, M.H., Fire Dynamics Tools (FDTs), NUREG-1805, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2004, Chapter 13, and Supplement 1, 2013: flashover methods and lining material properties.

Frequently Asked Questions

What heat release rate causes flashover?

It depends mostly on the size of the openings and the room surfaces. For a typical small room with a door, the MQH, Babrauskas and Thomas methods give roughly 1 to 2 MW. A useful quick estimate is 750 kW times the opening area in square meters times the square root of the opening height in meters.

Which flashover method should be used?

None is clearly better; they agree within about a factor of two over typical rooms. NFPA 555 presents several methods side by side, and taking the lowest result is the cautious choice. MQH is the only one that accounts for the wall lining and how long it has been heated.

What is the ventilation factor?

It is the opening area times the square root of the opening height, Ao times the square root of Ho. The air flow through a door or window into a burning room is about 0.5 kg/s per m5/2 of ventilation factor, which limits how large a fire the room can sustain.

Why does the result change with exposure time?

Only the MQH method depends on time, through the wall heat transfer coefficient. Cold linings absorb heat quickly, so early in a fire more heat goes into the walls and a larger fire is needed for flashover. Once the lining heats through, the coefficient drops to the conductivity divided by the thickness and the flashover heat release rate falls.

Related Tools and Services

More fire dynamics and detection calculators

Engineering aid only, provided as is and without warranty. Results depend on the inputs and on the simplifying assumptions of the method summarized on each tool page, and DGA has not verified them for your application. They do not replace code-required design, testing or review by the licensed engineer responsible for the project. Use of the tools is subject to the Terms of Use.

Related Reading

Articles from DGA Insights on the code and the method behind this calculator.

Quick inquiry

Need these results reviewed for a submittal?

Your name, a way to reach you, and where the project is. One of our licensed PEs replies within one business day. No sales calls.

Prefer to describe it first? Open the Project Desk